Good primer on White news...
Words of wisdom...
Funny stuff!
This phallus symbolizes the model's obsession with the penis and her lifelong quest to achieve vaginal orgasm:
On 23 March 2013, I was told by a member of staff at Southborough Library that I was searching for Internet Porn on a library PC, despite their being a) no evidence; b) the fact that Library staff are not psychic; &, c) are not known to me personally. Thus, they could not know my intentions.
On 3 April 2013, I received a letter from yourselves claiming I had accessed Websites (at Southborough Library) that were blocked - with no explanation as to how I could access such Sites (A bit like claiming I had passed through a locked door without a key.)
On 4 June 2013, I received another letter from yourselves claiming I had - as above - somehow violated your Acceptable Use Policy (AUP). (I was told I could print a copy of this document from the pre-screen that appears before every customer Internet session at any library.)
On 6 June 2013, I was told at Tunbridge Wells Library that I had been blocked from using the Library PCs as a result of the content of the letter referred to in the previous paragraph - even though this letter does not make any such statement. (This staff member had not actually read the letter and/or did not understand its content.)
On 8 June 2013, I could not make a booking on a Tunbridge Wells Library PC, despite receiving no written notification that I could not do so. A member of staff had to make the booking for me; after conferring with their manager.
On 2 July 2013, I was told at Tonbridge Library that I was no longer allowed to use their PCs. I was again shown your letter of 4 June 2013, as if this was proof, which it was not. This staff member had not actually read the letter and/or did not understand its content. (I was allowed to use their PCs after they realised their mistake.)
All of the above shows Library Staff all-too-eager to make negative assumptions about Black people - without evidence - and to believe that bullying, ridicule and bringing their personal problems into work represents good Customer Service.
This also allows me to do the same with about White people - but with evidence. The Library Service:
The problem for Whites in all interactions with Blacks is that if they are subjectively-based, Whites can easily be accused of White supremacy while it is correspondingly difficult for Whites to claim Black supremacy.
Whites are not going to protect non-Whites from the predations of their own White supremacy so non-Whites have to.
White supremacy is like paedophilia - incurable. Therefore, I can only repeat my threat contained in my letter of 8 June 2013 that I can see no other alternative than legal action (for Harassment & Discrimination) should the above violation of my Common Law rights occur again.
As always, Whites want to protect the lazy from their own fecklessness - so long as they are White. The White sense of racial entitlement makes them think they have an automatic right to a job regardless of skills, abilities, experience and qualifications; making it actually unnecessary to possess any of these things to a high degree.
Jobs do not possess an intrinsic nationality, so this means protecting lazy Whites from non-White competition, as well as from the realization that the world does not owe Whites a living.
As with industries protected by high import tariffs, local workers will simply see that, since their jobs are protected, there will be less need for them to actually earn the right to be employed by actually working hard.
Encouraging laziness - in this way - simply undermines any likely economic recovery by subsidising failure, so that White politicians can get easy votes from other White supremacists.
Yet another White supremacist trying to tell Blacks what to do - as if slavery had never been abolished.
Nowhere is there a mention of White supremacy because the author is confused over whether she is against President Obama's policies or whether she just cannot stomach a Black man in the White House.
Gun control would help Whites improve their lives, since they are the ones most likely go on on a rampage with a semi-automatic against other Whites. Gun control is not gun abolition, so no-one is disarmed against those who illegally own weapons. Blacks have shown the lead here since they need weapons more than Whites do to protect themselves against White supremacists, but have not been so ready to resort to violence to solve their problems as Whites historically have been.
Healthcare as outlined can only work if people work more often than they are sick – and if they are socially responsible. If not, they are going to die through a lack of contributions. There is also no explanation as to why socialised medicine leads to the death of private healthcare when it does not in the other countries in which it was tried.
This author does to admit why Blacks are poorer than Whites – White supremacist capitalism – and so ruins her own argument by claiming capitalism can make Blacks richer; while ignoring the fact that it cannot make them White. The logical conclusion is that Blacks and Whites should be racially-segregated in their capitalist practices, but she never mentions this. There is no talk of welfare recipients here when they are White (corporate welfare) only when they are Black. Blacks must work hard to escape poverty but Whites do not, since they are best placed to benefit from Institutional Racism. The American Dream created by Whites was a racist trap for Blacks, so there can be no talk of taking advice from Whites who benefit from such White hypocrisy.
In the end, of course, what this writer is doing is speak against a Black president through his Black critics in order to avoid being called a White supremacist by talking through his White critics. But since her writing drips with a condescending tone toward Blacks who do not agree with her, she merely reveals her KKK inclinations and her inability to see beyond skin color as a badge of identity and to face the fact that Whites have a strong sense of racial grievance because Whites cannot convince Blacks that they are no longer White supremacist – especially when Whites still vote on the basis of skin color. Blacks vote on the basis of protecting themselves from White supremacy; Whites on the basis of protecting White supremacy. Whites call both groups racist – as if the self-defense of the former were a negative. There is also no recognition that President Obama's popularity is because his White opponents are such poor quality Whites who live in fear of soon becoming an oppressed minority. Here Whites show their racial resentment of the fact that White leaders are not good and have nowhere to lead Whites.
| RATING: | 100% |
| FORMAT: | Book |
Cleverly-titled book that also looks at why White kids are sitting together in the cafeteria, as well, and for exactly the same reason - White supremacy.
This book unpacks the inherent racism of its title and tries to move beyond fear, anger and denial to a deep understanding of why there is so much silence in the Western world about political skin issues - apart from politically-correct gesturing. This is especially useful for those Whites, who refuse to listen to Black concerns about White racism as being nothing more than paranoid/schizophrenia - or the whining of spoiled children.
Essentially a clinical psychologist’s approach to the necessity for a racial identity in a White supremacist world, to act as a defensive bulwark against the inherent White is Beautiful nature of White culture. A self-fulfilling necessity for personal development in such an environment - as gender consciousness is to women in a sexist culture.
Oddly, White parents can become so embarrassed about discussing racism with their offspring that the issue becomes something akin to an erotophobe talking about sex or Superman holding a piece of kryptonite.
The author suggests that encouraging more diversity in formal education leads to more of the same culturally, but this is rather naïve. A little weak on substantive theory, but good on the research and personal experiences of all the witnesses involved.
