Friday, 17 April 2015

Andreas Lubitz planned spectacular gesture

(2015)

Such a Caucasian Thing To Do

Only Whites could ever pretend to be stunned by the revelation that one of their own has committed suicide: Fortunately, none of the victims seem to be People of Color (POC).

Whites act surprised, yet benefit from White supremacy. Thus, Whites should have no real reason to die and - in fact - every reason to live, since their lives are made somewhat easier than those who have to actually work for a living.

Whites have the highest suicide rates in the world and often take others with them in the process of self-destruction (eg, Adolf Hitler). This explains the White penchant for apparently-randomized school spree-killings and mass murders on public thoroughfares, rather than doing the decent thing: Running a bath and opening a vein - like civilized death-obsessed people (eg, the Japanese).

However, Whites will try to pretend this deliberate plane crash was an act of murder or manslaughter to evade the issue of why Whites usually behave in such self-absorbed and suicidal ways. Because POC actually have a substantive culture and Whites do not, Whites are induced to create their sense of identity via infamous acts as their only outlet for achieving any kind of recognition - no matter how negative.

Whites spend so much of their time (more than 80%) with each other, that they come to view depressive people as normal because it is their norm - despite the fact that it is actually, among Whites, merely usual. This is why Whites are so poor at judging other Whites (& human character, in general) and find bad White behavior inexplicable, since depression is so common for Whites to display on a daily basis that it just seems natural and, therefore, not at all as threatening as it is for POC.

HAMLET: Ay, marry, why was he sent into England?
GRAVE-DIGGER: Why, because he was mad. He shall recover his wits there; or, if he do not, it’s no great matter there.
HAMLET: Why?
GRAVE-DIGGER: ‘Twill not he seen in him there. There the men are as mad as he.

William Shakespeare (1564-1616), English dramatist, poet. Hamlet, Act 5, Scene 1.

White mono-culturalism also illustrates why Whites cannot explain the behavior of POC - except in negative terms. The positive behavior Blacks display (eg, Notting Hill Carnival) is unusual for a White; Whites are simply not used to seeing so many happy people. On the other hand, POC find it easy to spot someone with ongoing personal problems, because such a person is both unusual to them and a political threat to POC lives (eg, Jean-Marie Le Pen).

This incident also reveals a desperate White attempt to show the White perpetrator, here, in the best possible light (as in the photograph above) when, if he had been a POC, his entire ethnic group would have been besmirched and any sordid details of his private life either dredged-up or invented - or both.

Andreas Lubitz did not, primarily, trash his airplane because he was depressed, but because he was White. Therefore, more POC civil pilots are now needed in Western airlines to provide greater assurance that this sort of depressive episode happens far less often - if at all.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://protectingthehated.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Wednesday, 8 April 2015

“All schools must promote ‘British Values’”

(2015)

“British Values”

Summary: The White Hypocrisy of forcing “White Values” onto others while claiming to be tolerant of difference.

Whites claim the following as “British Values”, when they are really nothing more than aspirational utopian Virtues:

  1. Democracy (ie, so long as Whites are the majority);
  2. equality before the law (ie, laws created solely by Whites);
  3. gender equality (ie, the hope that White women will not start having sex with Black men [to get back at White men for sexism]);
  4. individual liberty (ie, the liberty to infringe the liberty of others);
  5. mutual respect & tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs (ie, those whose beliefs are not White; White being the standard against which all other beliefs are judged. This was not displayed by those Whites who proclaimed Je Suis Charlie);
  6. personal & social responsibility (ie, accusing others of moral degeneracy when Whites get drunk, take drugs, have sex with children, etc); &,
  7. political freedom (ie, the freedom to impose freedom on others by force);
  8. respect for British institutions (ie, those created by, and for the sole benefit of, Whites which POC are not allowed to criticize otherwise they are to be told to leave the country).
  9. respect for the rule of law (ie, laws created solely for the benefit of Whites);

Of course, none of these claims is particularly British; making the White implication that they possess a monopoly on such values inherently false. It is also difficult, after all, to find Whites actually practicing any of these virtues in real life; ie, the reality outside the realm of White fantasizing.

Reading Between the Lines

“British Values” is actually a code phrase for “White Values”. In essence, these are:

  1. Genocide;
  2. Looting; &,
  3. Rapine.

White History

Whites are bad at studying their own history because it makes them feel guilty. Easier to pretend that the past does not matter (eg, Get over it! - even though Whites refuse to) and try to evade the issues thrown-up by such an inherently-morbid subject.

Whites, here, are conflating Values (personal qualities to be achieved) with Virtues (the means of achieving Values) to imply that merely saying one possesses values negates the need for actually possessing supporting virtues - despite the fact that Virtues are the sole means of expressing Values. (For example, the Virtue of Honesty expresses a commitment to the Value of a purposeful life.) Here, Whites are trying to act like Christians who preach Christian Values in public; while practicing immoral Virtues (ie, Vices) in private.

As UK Whites conflate Church & State (Promotion/Brainwashing; Personal/Political; Virtues/Values; Nationality/Ethnicity; etc), they also confuse political loyalty to the State with personal loyalty to Whites: A brazen attempt to make anyone not-White-enough a lapdog of Whites. Conflating the Personal with the Political means Whites taking Political comments Personally. This view that all of life is give and take and nothing is to be shared explains White hostility when others disagree with them since, then, non-White dissidents are making it clear that they will give nothing in return for the nothing Whites offer.

Why Now?

Why did Whites not teach their children so-called British values before? UK Whites have never tried to inculcate “British values” concerning openly-radical and supposedly un-British organizations like the BNP, the National Front or UKIP - because White lives were, and are, not at stake. Now, after 500 years of White racist radicalism, it is far too late to stop the radicalisms that Whites, themselves, cause - unless Whites wish to renounce the White supremacy which benefits them all, that is. This is an unlikely prospect since Whites only promote White Values - especially when their lives are in danger - because Black Values (like Black Lives) do not matter to Whites.

Because defining Britishness is quintessentially un-British, since positive British values do not really exist and because Whites assume all Whites think alike - as they assume People of Color POC do - there is no perceived White need to teach what is already (supposedly) known. The basic White idea is to teach those whom Whites fear to obey these non-existent British values, while Whites, themselves, continue to follow the three negative ones listed at the start of this posting. This explains the White Guilt that comes from any honest assessment of Britishness, as well as why the collective noun for a group of Whites is An Hypocrisy of Whites.

Whites are simply trying to foist their ethnic superiority fantasies onto others and claiming that to do so is natural and normal. And that anyone who disagrees should be discriminated against.

White paranoia

Whites are terrified of those they share the UK with - especially Muslims, at the present time - as well as being scared of the inevitable White paranoia caused by centuries of White supremacy. The latter haunts the White imagination because Whites know that such bad behavior also has negative consequences for them; eg, mental illness, fear of POC revenge, etc.

Brainwashing

Like Whites in apartheid South Africa, UK Whites need to placate their own racist xenophobia by feeble-yet-frequent attempts at brainwashing POC (eg, Citizenship Tests), in the desperate hope that such people will not seek revenge for the Institutionally-racist nature of all White cultures - throughout the world.

Whites want that everyone be loyal to them and do as they say. Multiculturalism (ie, racial segregation) makes this impossible; hence, the White resentment at any idea of multiculture because it makes the re-enslavement of POC impossible.

Whites are also terrified that POC will out-breed them and, thus, be able to tell Whites what to do in a first-past-the-post electoral system, at which point Whites will clamor for the Proportional Representation PR they have always rejected in the past (because they were in the majority).

Trying to brainwash POC is, thus, also designed to ensure POC think, talk and act like Whites so that POC will kowtow to Whites (ie, accept White values as universal values) to compensate for the decline of White culture.

One can only wonder at the loneliness compelling Whites to try to force others to be like them as recompense for Whites not liking themselves - or even each other.

White Supremacy Means Never Having to Say You’re Sorry

In all this talk of so-called British Values, there is none of Whites renouncing White supremacy as the royal road to communality. Whites refuse to give up the only means of appearing to win every argument, in the hope that they will never have to take POC seriously.

British Education

The fundamental problem for Whites with implementing such value-laden nonsense as teaching so-called British Values in the UK educational curriculum is that British education is already riven with institutional racism. Whites already teach their negative value-system - but covertly, in case anyone notices they are White supremacist. Thus, they already promote “British Values”. White teachers teach POC that they are not valued by Whites as people, simply because Whites do not wish to educate POC to do well (compared with with White children) in the competition for jobs after leaving full-time schooling. Whites prefer, instead, to exclude them whenever legally possible; using laws created by Whites that allow them to be legally racist.

POC will be invited to state that they accept White values - particularly, White supremacy - or be subject to social exclusion by Whites. But this is a meaningless threat since such exclusion is already practiced by Whites, on the assumption that POC will not accept White supremacy - a completely correct assumption, as it happens.

White Supremacy

Obviously, Whites are not going to openly-discuss their sole source of cultural identity: White supremacy. To admit that this is the underlying British Value-of-all-values would be a stroke of honesty for which Whites are not famous: It would be a tacit admission that Whites actually lack meaningful values. It would also give POC the perfect reason (among many) for having nothing to do with Whites, nor their alleged Values - in any way, shape or form. This is why Whites lie about who they are to try and manipulate others into loving them, politically, when their parents did not, personally.

Moreover, White supremacy creates the problem for Whites that no White can ever fully know himself nor, therefore, live fully and joyously. They can never know, for sure, if any success they achieve is more the result of their abilities or more to do with the unearned help they obtained from White supremacy. This explains the White inability to grow-up as the direct result of this lack of self-awareness; additionally explaining their penchant for mass murder, divorce, suicide, etc.

White Propaganda

There is little White talk of virtues that reflect these stated White Values because Whites do not practice the values they claim to possess; hence, their embarrassment and inappropriate aggression as they vainly-try to enumerate values they never actually display. Whites do not reference Rationality, a purposeful life nor Moral Choice as British Values; tacitly revealing the moral emptiness at the heart of this all-too-White debate; making this is all just more of the same Manifest Destiny propaganda of implying Whites have the best values (regardless of whether they are actually practiced or not) and, so, are the most fit to rule the world - and save it from POC in the process.

Ultimately, Whites do not wish to reflect on the abject hypocrisy and inherent contradiction of forcing White Values down people’s throats while claiming tolerance for dissent.


See Also: Dear Mr Gove: What’s so ‘British’ About Your ‘British Values’?
Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://protectingthehated.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Tuesday, 7 April 2015

Why Are Black Women Less Physically Attractive?

(2011)

Less Attractive to Whom - White Supremacists?

Black Beauty?

Scientific Proof White Supremacists Find Black Women Unattractive!

Feeble attempt to re-introduce physiognomy through the circular arguments of pseudo-science and scientism; creating the self-fulfilling prophecies used to vainly justify White supremacy. Darwin’s theories are being politically-exploited to explain both alleged White genetic superiority and, its necessary corollary, the claimed genetic inferiority of People Of Color (POC) - but all this really explains is White amorality. A more suitable forum for such political-ideology-masquerading-as-science (lack of empirical evidence, flawed premises & unexamined presuppositions) would be Stormfront.

The question is actually a race-baiting statement (Black women are ugly) that pretends it is true simply by being stated as a rhetorical question. Its only function is to get attention by causing offense; thereby generating the anger that will help obscure its rather obvious falsity.

The main reason psychology (& Evolutionary Psychology (EP)’s deterministic claims about Evolution) is not a hard science (like Physics & Chemistry) is because Whites - and their fellow-travelers - have always used it to justify White supremacy; thereby trying to elevate White personal preferences into the realm of objective facts - with Whites reigning supreme. EP never says anything disparaging about Whites since it is designed to flatter them by claiming there is scientific evidence for their genetic superiority over others. This is a way for Whites to evade White guilt for White supremacy by pretending the latter is natural and normal - the former created by Blacks seeking equality that is genetically-impossible for them to achieve.

Dr Kanazawa is careful-enough to not say that Black women are actually ugly, only that they are less attractive (to him, obviously). Rather than say less attractive to he says less attractive than; suggesting Blacks are objectively unattractive - not that Whites are objectively racist (a truth EP regularly evades). He clearly implies - since he claims to be an objective scientist - that Black women are, in fact, ugly. One might just as well ask Why are Whites more racist than other people? rather than the more scientific Are Whites more racist than other people?

Attractiveness, like intelligence, beauty and humor, are human qualities which are, like all personal qualities, not amenable to scientific and objective measurement - unlike physical quantities such as length, height & width. The scientistic belief that they are, is the simplistic reductionism that attempts to obliterate the many mysteries of life by pretending that anything can be measured - even how much you love your children, your wife & your car.

It is strange that if Black women really are less attractive than Others (racist code for White women), why there should be so few White people in the world and so many Black. Perhaps it is because the men who find Black women sexually-attractive are misguided and foolishly-unscientific in their amorous choices? Or, perhaps, it is because they are not White supremacists and/or do not live in White supremacist environments? Dr Kanazawa acts as though White supremacy simply does not exist - and yet that is the only context within which his comments make any sense, whatsoever. He lacks the intellectual rigor to understand that he does not actually tell an inconvenient truth about Black women, but one about the moral sewer that is White culture.

The problem with correlations and predictors is that they are not causations - they are intellectually-lightweight substitutes for them. They allow one to say anything about anything - at the most trivial level of self-indulgence. For example, White skin is the best predictor of White supremacism; physical beauty is closely-correlated with male erections; loneliness is strongly-correlated with ugliness; resentment at White supremacy is a predictor of ethnicity; anger at rape is a predictor of gender; being successful under Apartheid is correlated with skin-color; Why Do Whites Need Institutionalized Racism to be Successful?; Why is it the white man’s burden to bang all the hot chicks of other ethnic groups to produce beautiful mulatto babies?; Why Do Unattractive People Write Articles About Attractiveness?; the list is endless. The difficulty in finding causative agents when dealing with complex human phenomena has constantly hampered White attempts to prove simplistic and behavioristic relationships between - and within - people and objects. Oddly, he even admits he can think of no other explanation for the data he pretends to interpret; revealing a decidedly-lackluster imagination, in the process, and a lazy unwillingness to engage in a basic literature review of his own discipline.

As White culture declines, Whites will do anything to justify their having more of what remains to be exploited of the world’s physical resources. Whites will also do all they can to mock and deride those they dread most in order to soothe their fears of eventual irrelevance and disappearance, just because of the presence of those others. Yet, Dr Kanazawa is so desperate to be accepted by Whites, that he mirrors their racism - even to the extent of claiming that he, himself, is a member of one of the physically-unattractive ethnic groups he claims to observe. One only has to read Why we are losing this war to see that he is angrily-resentful about the fact that no matter his absurdly-overstated racism, Whites will never accept him as fully-human.

Dr Satoshi Kanazawa tries to hide his ignorance and poorly-suppressed anger behind claims his critics are politically-correct and wish to suppress any scientific discussion of Ethnicity. He refuses to accept that science must be socially-responsible, since good science is designed to be socially-profitable (otherwise, what’s the point?) and that the search for truth is not the only reason for scientific activity. Otherwise, Josef Mengele’s experiments on Jewish children would suddenly become scientifically-acceptable - so long as they produced the truth of what happens to people when you abuse them. Moreover, Whites would never accept being quarantined from others simply because it is a fact that all their cultures are institutionally-racist, nor would any White allow research into the effects of pornography on very young children - so there are clear ethical limits to seeking scientific truth, no matter those White scientists who claim to be engaged in a disinterested search for the true nature of objective reality. Science only has value if it is constructive, otherwise it can only be destructive - there is no third option.

The peculiar awfulness of Whites is that they only research topics that help them maintain their political status quo. They never, for example, search for any IQ or sexual attractiveness differences between people with different colored eyes or different shoe or breast sizes. This is because such research might find that women with small breasts are the most intelligent; justifying the denial of higher-educational opportunities to the superbly well-endowed. The whole point of science that is to be fed into political policy is to discriminate against someone - anyone - so that scarce resources can be monopolized by the powerful.

Attacking his detractors for being politically-correct is a politically-correct attempt to conceal the flaws in Dr Kanazawa’s own work: The racist agenda underpinning it & that of offering opinions not based on objective data instead of scientific analysis. The author believes politics is the slave of science, such that politics can never criticize its master. He wants nothing more than to openly-express his fear of not being accepted by Whites because it is all he has to offer the Caucasians who pretend to love him for agreeing with their xenophobia.

Therefore, Dr Kanazawa will not be required by Whites to apologize to Black women for his White supremacy, so won’t do so; revealing that Whites will continue to cleave to their racist political agenda through the use of pseudo-science and, particularly, the absurd claim that there are meaningful differences between people based on skin pigmentation.


More detailed debunkings here: What are the scientific / methodological objections to the Psychology Today article “Why Are Black Women Less Physically Attractive Than Other Women?” being removed from the publication?
Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://protectingthehated.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Tuesday, 31 March 2015

White Supremacy

Year:
2015
Outstanding Performances:
ente…
V. Smith…
Premiss:
We do not care what color you are, so long as it is White.
Themes:
Alienation
Destiny
Emotional repression
Ethnicity
Free Speech
Identity
Loneliness
Materialism
Narcissism
Nostalgia
Political Correctness
Republicanism
Sexual Repression
Solipsism
Stereotyping
White culture
White guilt
White supremacy
Similar to:
@whitewhines
White Whine

More White Whine with Your Fish?

Thin-skinned Caucasians playing the Race Card of believing only they possess a right to Free Speech

Response to these Claims of Playing the Race Card:

Statements made to others that are apolitical are White delusions: They do not exist because all communication with others is political. White statements decrying politics are, in themselves, political; while making claims without evidence is just as bigoted as Whites are when regarding those with whom they do not agree. White Identity politics (ie, White supremacy) is the solipsism that pretends it is not the least bit political; while serving the all-important political end of White reality-evasion.

If, for example, Frank TALKER wrote a review of the movie Casablanca without mentioning Hitler, Nazi Germany and White totalitarianism, the PC-brigade would be happy. However, Frank TALKER lives in the real world, not the Hollywood one.

Projection & Displacement

Whites invented the People Of Color (POC)-only Race Card to allege POC gain an advantage from using it - without explicitly stating what that advantage might be, save to suggest POC exploit it to hide their own cultural and personal flaws. POC can never benefit from any kind of Race Card when POC control no institutions in any White culture in any of the 52 White-ruled countries of the globe - unlike Whites (eg, by claiming the Race Card is being played by their enemies whenever Whites are criticized for playing the Whites-only Race Card).

Whites are playing the (their) Race Card at exactly the moment they claim others are, to pretend White supremacy does not exist; the Race Card being one of the many negative products of White Guilt and an example of racism, in itself. As a rape victim cannot play the non-existent gender card, playing the Race Card is precisely the kind of argument pedophiles and rapists use when confronted with their victims: “She was asking for it”.

White free speech

Whites take political commentary personally because their culture conflates such things as the Personal with the Political; the Public with the Private; Ethnicity with Nationality; Correlations with Causations; to more easily cheat people into working for a social acceptance - from Whites - that never comes and is never intended to.

Whites demand that any discussion of White supremacy be umpired by Whites - to achieve their desired goal of not feeling guilty about how they benefit from unearned privilege (& then blaming POC for the impossibility of achieving such a goal). Hence, the White invention of a psychologically-soothing Race Card that, somehow, can only be played by POC since, when Whites play it (via White supremacy), that is just how things are (& are supposed to be). If Whites feel bad, POC are playing the Race Card; if Whites feel good, POC have learned their lowly place in the great White scheme of things. A Card that only Whites can play is an example of the only racial equality Whites preach: The unfounded allegation that POC are equally racist when compared to Whites.

“Reverse Racism”

Hardly surprising, then, that Whites think the only equity possible between ethnic groups is their own negativity toward the ethnicity of others - as well as their own ethnicity, which they frequently deny possessing. Because Whites think POC possess no positive qualities, Whites invented the similarly non-existent (& for the same reasons outlined in this posting) concept of “Reverse Racism” - as if that could possibly make White racism seem reasonable and justified. A concept not based on irrational fear, but cultural self-defense.

“Blaming the Victim”

The White claim of POC playing the Race Card allows Whites to benefit from the Whites-only Race Card by implying all complaints of White supremacy are inherently false; making all White claims about POC, thus, inherently true. The Race Card serves the dual purpose of allowing Whites to perpetuate the political benefits of being openly-racist (the only way in which racism flourishes to maximum White advantage) while simultaneously-denying that those very benefits even exist. It is a Card only Whites can use and helps assuage guilt for evil actions by pretending such actions are justified.

White guilt

Because there are no rational arguments in favor of racism, the Race Card is simply a desperate White means for evading debate about the benefits all Whites receive from White supremacy. The White hope is that White Guilt will recede, but the universal (guilt-induced) anger with which Whites make such claims proves this political gambit does not work; only making matters worse for Whites - both psychologically and politically.

The power of the White claim that POC play the Race Card is really the power of paralyzing White Guilt; the inevitable product and direct result of the inherent amorality of the various White cultures. Thus, Whites are clearly more concerned with White Guilt than they are with POC lives: So long as non-one mentions the Racewar, Whites could not care less.

Xenophobia

The urge to stereotype others is strong in Whites because it helps them feel they have overcome their fear of others (by inventing comforting delusions about the automatic inferiority of those others). It also convinces Whites they need not listen to anyone other than themselves in their belief that they possess a right to deny others the same rights they demand for themselves; eg, so-called Free Speech (ie, the right to offend people for being different). Whites only favor Free Speech when it flatters Whites.

Political Correctness

Whites need, desperately, to live in a contextless political vacuum in the hope that no blame attaches to them for anything, whatsoever, and everything that happens, anywhere, can be blamed on someone else (eg, 9/11 had nothing to do with Whites unwanted interference in the internal affairs of sovereign Arab states for the past 70 years); rendering political commentary as inevitable as it is necessary. Under the tenets of Free Speech, such commentary cannot - reasonably - be disallowed except by political correctoids - who actually wish to escape the politics they preach; that is, to escape the limitations of reality. The White definition of Free Speech requires the invented distraction of a Race Card (& its necessary handmaiden, Political Correctness) to evade the fact that Free Speech for those darker-skinned than Whites is under constant attack - from Whites.

Political-correctoids are not free agents, so never act like ones. They fool themselves into thinking they can tell others how to think, speak & behave. They have no substantive arguments and simply rely on reality-evasion to psychologically-support their own empty lifestyles that are built on nothing more than metaphysical, epistemological & ethical sand. It is Whites who posses the cultural and personal flaws the invention of the Race Card is meant to conceal.

Dr. Evil

Whites live their lives on the basis that their obsession with fantasy is more important than reality. Their talk is all despair at finding the world will not conform to their übermensch desires; hence, their wish to compartmentalize experience in such a way that real-life is successfully-elided - at least in their Bond villain dreams of world domination (eg, the World Bank & the IMF).

This White schizophrenia accounts for Whites’ endless, unjustified complaints when others do not think, act or talk as they do. And for Whites making false claims about others without evidence. And for Whites’ need to mock others - who can see right through them with the weapons of irony, satire & sarcasm. And for Whites’ need to destroy competition rather than win-out against it in a fair fight.

It is not necessary to agree with others – that is the totalitarian dream represented by Political-Correctness. It is, after all, a simple matter to refrain from engaging with that which one finds disagreeable or to disassociate oneself from those with whom one is not compatible. But that would mean accepting others’ right to self-determination - something Whites find impossible.

The real world

Non-Whites and Jews avoid Whites precisely because they do not wish to be killed, mocked or brainwashed by those same Whites; hence, White resentment when a White supremacy alert (what Whites disparagingly call: Playing the Race Card) is issued by POC against any product of White culture. Few find Whites trustworthy; making Whites feel lonely and psychologically-adrift as human beings. (One of the curious by-products of Whiteness is the White penchant for pet-ownership, along with the search for extraterrestrial life - to counter their self-willed, lonely-at-the-top existential and terrestrial ennui - rather than adopting the simpler expedient of making friends here on Earth with their fellow humans.)

Ultimately, the Race Card is a card Whites designed that only People of Color are alleged to play; but from which only Whites can benefit: “Heads I Win; Tails You Lose”. The mere claim of playing the Race Card is the only way the Race Card can ever be successfully played.


Copyright © 2015 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://protectingthehated.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.

Wednesday, 25 February 2015

I only get leading roles if Ryan Gosling can’t play them

David OYELOWO is aware that Whites are emotionally-retarded; eg, pedophilia, alcoholism, illegal-drug addiction, etc. Whites invented Political Correctness in a vain attempt to conceal this.

Whites can only see non-White actors in non-White specific stories since that allows Whites to emotionally-distance themselves from non-Whites, as people, in stories that are issue-driven rather than character-focused.

If a Person of Color is cast without regard to skin color, it forces Whites to address the very humanity Whites reject in such people. Dramatically, Whites would then be required to identify and emotionally-empathize with non-White characters when they cannot do this with non-White people in real life.

The White Guilt of knowing that all Whites benefit from White fear of non-Whites prevents Whites from facing-up to White supremacy by admitting People of Color are just as human as Whites. It is easier to assume that the feared deserve being feared - as the lower class deserve to be feared or rape-victims or Jews or Muslims, etc. This White assumption neatly attempts to evade guilt; yet has to take place continually despite this Guilt’s alleged non-existence.

When People of Color are cast in non-skin color specific roles (eg, Omar Sharif, Denzel Washington, etc) Whites simply pretend that the actor is not not White; eg, that inherent self-contradiction: I don’t see you as a Black person, I see you as a person. (Yet, one would first have to notice the skin color of the person one is addressing before pretending one does not notice it!) This, rather than admit White resentment at not being invited to dramatically-identify with one of their own ethnic group.

As in real life, Whites hope to convince non-Whites to become chocolate-colored Whites (coconuts) to gain White Acceptance; ie, Tolerance & condescension, so that Whites can run away from their guilt feelings about their continual need to treat others badly, springing from their initial – irrevocable - choice to so do.


Copyright © 2014 Frank TALKER. Permission granted to reproduce and distribute it in any format; provided that mention of the author’s Weblog (http://protectingthehated.blogspot.com) is included: E-mail notification requested. All other rights reserved.